Is Sheriff Sills a criminal?

 

PAGE 1

BULLETIN, BULLETIN, BULLETIN

Is Sheriff Sills A Criminal?

Sheriff Sills wrote a letter to The Board Of Commissioners dated March 5, 1998 A.D., asking The Board Of Commissioners, to grant him the following powers and we quote:

"I intend for my office to be the primary enforcement arm for ordinances related to traffic related matters, illegal dumping/littering, alcohol violations, and any future ordinances regarding disorderly conduct. All other ordinances such as building and zoning, animal control, licensing, etc. will be primarily enforced by your appointed agents ... in those incidents where the sheriff's office is requested my enforcement will be with the assistance and advice of your agents, as many of these matters will require their expertise."

The word we are dealing with here is LITTERING. What is the law on LITTERING in the State Of Georgia State Law Section 16-7-43

It shall be unlawful for any person or persons to dump, deposit, throw, or leave or to cause or permit dumping, depositing, placing, throwing, or leaving of litter on public or private property ...

Q: Is Sheriff Howard Richard Sills A Person?
A: Yes

Q: Does He Fall Under This Law Even As A Sheriff?
A: Yes.

On January 12th, 1999 A.D At 5:02 P.M. through 5:15 P.M., the duly elected Sheriff of Putnam County acting in his capacity as The Sheriff of Putnam County, did knowingly and willfully LITTER, in the presence of his agent the Detective Lee Wilson and before eyewitnesses, chief of security that's legally registered with the State of Georgia Claude G. Turner, and legally registered security officer Henry Torres, as well as a camera woman, video taping the event named Mrs. Nefertari Hayes and a second camera woman, named Chandra Lampkin. In the presence of 5eyewitnesses, Sheriff Sills broke the very law of LITTERING that he claimed his office was responsible for and all of this is captured on video tape. (look at the last page)

Q: Is Sheriff Howard Richard Sills above the law, because he is a sheriff?
A: Captain Charles Myers, of Putnam County's Sheriff's Department and eyewitness Detective Lee Wilson, said out their own mouths, "no he isn't above the law".

PAGE 2

Q: If Sheriff Howard Sills broke the Georgia State Law Section 16-7-4 on littering, did he commit a crime?
A: Absolutely! Sheriff Howard R. Sills committed a crime against the state of Georgia, Putnam County, and The Sheriff's department.

Q: Does this make him a criminal?
A: If he is not above the law and he committed a crime, then he is criminal.

Q: Do you have any proof that he committed a crime?
A: Yes, here it is, taken right from the video tape, recorded by Mrs. Nefertari Hayes and Ms. Chandra Lampkin, giving you a step by step, view of this public official violating the law. (Again, look at the last page.)

We urge all concerned citizens and others to engage in a petition for RECALL according to the Official Georgia Code Annotated Law 45-11-4 states: Misconduct of sheriff may consist in acts of commission or nonfeasance as in those of commission, misfeasance (improper and unlawful execution of an act that in itself is lawful and proper) or malfeasance (misconduct or wrong doing). Also according to The Black Law Dictionary on page 235, it state: In a general sense, any violation or omission of a legal or moral duty. More particularly, the neglect or failure to fulfill in a just and proper manner the duties of an office or fiduciary employment. Every violation by a trustee of a duty which equity lay upon him, whether willful and fraudulent or done through negligence or arising through mere oversight or forgetfulness, is a breach of duty. Sheriff Howard Richard Sills' duty was to enforce the law concerning LITTERING.

Q: Is He Guilty Of Littering?
A: Yes, And That Is A Violation Of The Law And A Breach Of His Duty.

Because Sheriff Howard R. Sills did, knowingly and willfully, in the presence of others violate the law which renders him by the evidence, a criminal and therewith, not worthy to wear the honor of a sheriff or the shield, of a protector and defender of the law. A petition of RECALL is appropriate. According to the Georgia Recall Act Of 1989 By Max Cleland, Secretary Of State Capitol on page 3 Chapter 4 section 21-4-3 (7) it states: "Grounds For Recall" means: (a) that the official has, while holding public duties office, conducted himself or herself in a manner which relates to and adversely affects the administration of his or her office;
(ii) has violated his or her oath of office;
(iii) has committed an act of misconduct in office;
(iv) is guilty of a failure to perform duties prescribed by law; or

②

PAGE 3

(v) has willfully misused, converted or misappropriated, without authority public property or public funds entrusted to or associated with the elective office that has been elected or appointed.

The Constitution of the State of Georgia, page 3 SECTION II under Origin And Structure Of Government it states: "Public officers are the trustees and servants of the people and are at all times amenable to them."

And he is also guilty of violating codes from the Codes Of Ethics: "As a law enforcement officer my fundamental duty is to protect ... the weak against the oppression or intimidation .... I will never act officiously or permit personal feeling, prejudices, animosities, or friendships to influence my decisions ... I will enforce the law courteously and appropriately without fear or favor, malice or ill will, never employing unnecessary force or violence and never accepting gratuities."

Q: Did Any Of His Office Act As Accessory After The Fact?
A: We Think So And An On Going Investigation Is On Way, For Obstruction Of Justice, By Those Who Refused To Cite Him On Two Separate Occasions, When Asked To Do Their Duty, Sworn Jobs, They Said THEY WON'T, Not Can't. I WON'T.

Q: Would a person of his education and position, knowing they are being video taped, violate the law for all to see and admit it also?
A: No, they wouldn't and that is why we think he is unstable and feel that he should be removed from office and that somehow his traumatic divorce case of July 14th has affected or impairs his proper judgment.

The divorce files that are locked away, should be opened for all to see, how it affected him, the stress, and most important, the reason for the divorce, which is said to be, locked away from the public eye. It states: The clerk shall file stamp the entire file except the final decree and place it under seal in an envelope clearly marked SEALED - ACCESS BY SUPERIOR COURT ORDER ONLY. The file shall be locked securely so that no unauthorized access is allowed. So ordered this 14th day of July 1998, signed by Judge Superior Court, Ocmulgee Judicial Circuit, William Prior Jr., (of course it would be him) So, we need, according to the above, to get an authorized individual to gain access to these files, to find out the real grounds for divorce, the cost for the action of Howard R. Sills plaintiff verses Cathy Denise Sills, maiden name Taylor, Civil Action File No. 98-CV151-5 and of course the county clerk, would be Chief Deputy, Helen T. Kitchen who signed on his behalf.

We feel this information will open the way for further investigation into his state of mind. The reason being, on the given

③

PAGE 4

document, filed July 15, 1998 A.D., number 15 reads, Grounds For Divorce (specify) irretrievably broken, which falls under The Domestic Relation on page 265, under Judicial Decision Analysis 1 General Consideration: adultery, cruel treatment desertion, marriage intermarriage, irretrievably broken other grounds for divorce. What is missing in this, specify meaning:

spec·i·fy (spĕs′ə-fī′) tr.v.
*spec·i·fied, spec·i·fy·ing, spec·i·fies.

1. To state explicitly or in detail: specified the amount needed.

2. To include in a specification.
   from Late Latin specificāre, from specificus, specific.

So, to state irretrievably broken, is not being specific. It's not giving detail of the reason, and we feel that this information could have a great affect on any human being's performance, and most psychiatrists agree as well. We spoke to one in Milledgeville that refused to be his psychiatrist. When asked, what's wrong with Sheriff Howard Richard Sills. He Said, "I'd Rather Not Say."

It is quite clear, that something is wrong here. The harassment case with the Nuwuabians is not the only case, he is involved in. There are other cases surrounding, Sheriff Howard Richard Sills, violating the rights of innocent people we feel, as an outlet for his emotional upsets for instance. A divorce can be a traumatic experience for anyone to go through, especially if you have been newly elected as sheriff. As early as January 2, 1998 A.D. Sheriff Howard Richard Sills, was involved in various crimes of violence involving innocent people. As the incidents of violence increased and the level of tension increased, and as the time for Mr. Sills divorce neared, he seemed to be involved with more and more episodes of violence.

November 1996 A.D. Mr. Sills elected as County Sheriff with supposed happy marriage, more than likely on the decline:

— January 2, 1998 A.D. Harassment Of Mr. Ken Brown
  CIVIL CASE ACTION NO. 98CV121-4

— January 6, 1998 A.D. Physical Assault Of Mr. Larry Thompkins

— March 26, 1998 A.D. Ms. Alicia Jones Harassed And Detained

April 20, 1998 A.D. Mr. Sills sued by Mr. Ken Brown for $10,000 dollars, for violence of his civil rights and abuse.

ON THE VERY SAME DAY ...

— April 20, 1998 A.D. Sills races out To The Nuwuabian land, illegally closes Rameses Social Club with unsigned, unstamped papers
— illegally removed the electric meter, cutting off electricity, because he didn't contact Chuck Lynette, who was the only person to give authority for this

④

– the electric company did not know,
the meter was removed from the premises until 4 months later.

— May 6, 1998 A.D. 17 Car Entourage lead by Sills to change the locks on 6 doors to Rameses Social Club, that Senator Floyd Griffin stated was an overreaction and was an over use of force.

— Sills came with illegal injunction from Madison to close down Rameses Social Club, without any authority to do so; going against authority is illegal, and only the board of Commissioners and county attorney, can file for an injunction legally, the sheriff cannot.

May 14, 1998 A.D Sills signs divorce agreement with wife

– a series of on going road blocks weekly, on highway near 404 Shady Dale Road, harassing people coming in and out of Shady Dale Road.

July 14, 1998 A.D. Divorce Finalized

— October 1, 1998 A.D. Howard Richard Sills came harass Robbie Hibner, a 23 year old adult with a child of her own, called her out of her house as if she was a minor, upsetting her unnecessarily

From then on, it seems, Howard Richard Sills, changed into a real "rascal", after which followed, a series of raids, and drug busts on people he knew his whole life. These rash reactions are called Post Trauma, and in light of this, gives definite reasons for the divorce case to be opened. Either Sheriff Howard Richard Sills is showing signs of instability or he is an out right violator of the law, with total disregard of the laws and that is grounds alone to be recalled from office, before he kills somebody, and their blood would be on your hands. Can't you see he is disturbed and deranged?

On January 16, 1999 A.D. Chief Of Security, Claude G. Turner, along with William Walker and Nathaniel Washington went and spoke to Mr. Ronald James, a Commissioner On The Planning and Zoning Board of Monticello, who is also a member of the NAACP, to find out the proper procedures to charge Sheriff Howard Richard Sills with LITTERING. His Instructions were to find out the person who issues warrants. Mr. Turner called Putnam County Sheriff's office to find out who issues warrants. He was told that Magistrate Judge Helen Pierce issued warrants. Mr. Ronald James said, the only problem is, in Eatonton there is such a "tight web", that Mr. Claude G. Turner would have to go to Milledgeville to get results.

After Leaving Mr. Ronald James' Office, Mr. Claude G. Turner And his companions went to see Judge Pierce. After waiting around,

⑤

from 12:30 P.M. to 1:30 P.M., to speak to Judge Helen Pierce, when questioned about issuing the warrant for Sheriff Howard Richard Sills, She laughed and stated she could issue warrants to anyone in Putnam County, except for the sheriff. So after anticipating "the run around" from the tight web, Mr. Turner, Mr. Walker and Mr. Washington left Eatonton and headed to Milledgeville, to the court house.

Once in Milledgeville they had a conversation with a young woman, named Jeanette who worked for Judge Hulane E. George. Here is her card.

Judge George Hulane was unavailable. So after about 10 minutes, a sheriff's deputy, who did not give his name, referred them to go upstairs to the District Attorney's office. Mr. Claude Turner explained to the secretary, of that office, their reason for coming. She went into another area of the office and returned with a man, who did not identify himself. He began by saying "What would be the point?" Mr. Claude G. Turner replied, "The point would be that he (Sheriff Howard Richard Sills) needs to respect our property and the law". This same man advised them, they needed a citation and not a warrant. But it would have to be issued by a deputy, but that more than likely no deputy would, he added. When asked by this same man, what should they do. And his response was "why bother" and that You need to be careful of what you ask for, because You may not like the consequences.... The man gave Mr. Claude G. Turner a card from a nearby desk.

They were not invited into his office, but said they should go to see the magistrate judge, being Mrs. Pierce, which had already been done, so they left.

Then on January 26, 1999 A.D. Mr. Claude G. Turner and an elder, Dr. Eloah Emannuel went to Putnam County's Magistrates office to find out how to issue a citation. At 1:35 P.M. they arrived in Judge Helen Pierce's office. Judge Helen Pierce said, again, she had no authority over the sheriff and referred them to get a law enforcement officer. Dr. Emannuel asked if the sheriff was above the law. Judge

⑥

Pierce: He Is Not. Dr. Emannuel: Is There Some Peaceful Way To Resolve This Because According To U.S. Constitution, We Have The Right To Redress The Government If We Have A Grievance." There are laws pertaining to this; yet, she had no knowledge of what to do. Judge Helen Pierce Referred them to a law enforcement officer. On her advice Mr. Turner, and Dr. Emannuel went to the Sheriff's Department. Then, they, went To The Putnam County court house where Dr. Emannuel saw a Sheriff's Deputy, named Mike Gaus, and asked him would he issue a citation to Sheriff Howard Richard Sills for LITTERING. His answer was that he was stationed at the court house, that was his post. Mr. Turner And Dr. Emannuel thanked him and headed towards the Putnam County Sheriff Department, arriving at 1:50 p.m. After waiting at the Department Of Corrections, with no one at the window Mr. Claude G. Turner and Dr. Eloah Emannuel left. Then returned seeing Deputy Lee Wilson through a window. He came outside and asked could he help them. Mr. Claude Turner informed Deputy Lee Wilson what he wanted to do. His reply was, he didn't think it could be done. Dr. Emannuel asked was the sheriff above the law, to which Deputy Lee Wilson replied, no. Deputy Lee Wilson referred them to the magistrates office. Mr. Claude Turner told Deputy Lee Wilson, the magistrates judge sent them there. Deputy Lee Wilson told them to wait a few minutes and stepped back inside the office. When he returned he said he would not write Sheriff Sills a citation for LITTERING. From this answer you can assume, Deputy Lee Wilson could issue the citation to Sheriff Howard Richard Sills, but refused to do his duty. That would be obstruction of justice and aiding and abetting an offense to the law. At this point Dr. Emannuel asked was the sheriff above the law. Deputy Lee Wilson said he was trying to show a way to handle this situation, by referring them to either the Superior Court Judge or Probate Court Judge. After, going to the court house to see the Judge Jesse Copeland, who was in court, a sheriff's deputy, with captain's bars, asked could he help Mr. Turner and Dr. Emannuel. Once this deputy was informed, he said "I AM LOOKING AT YOU TO TELL YOU, THAT I AM NOT GOING TO ISSUE A CITATION." Why is everyone ignoring this obvious violation of the law?

Sheriff Howard Richard Sills needs to be removed. What he does, or is a part of is, obviously illegal activity and then showers or shrouds it by raids on places in Eatonton, who as a native of Eatonton, Sheriff Howard Richard Sills, knew existed all his life. He is raiding friends of the family and neighbors, just to get the Super Cop image. You are sitting on a time bomb waiting to blow-up. You won't be able to protect him for long. If you don't defuse it, we will defuse it by the judicial system. The governor, Mr. Barnes wants to know about these things, and is going to know why you allow these things to exist.

C.C. Of E.
Concerned Citizens Of Eatonton

⑦

PAGE 8

This Is Mr. Sills Writing On The Paper And Mr. Claude Turner Informing Mr. Sills Of The Illegal Taping

This Is A Picture Of Mr. Sills & Detective Wilson Sitting In His Car With The Camera On His Lap

This A Picture Of Mr. Sills (In Front) And Trying To Hand Chief Of Security Mr. Claude Turner The Complaint Papers

This Is Mr. Sills Insisting Mr. Claude Turner Take The Papers Illegally

This Is Mr. Sills' Own Hand Tossing The Papers On To The Road From His Car

These Are The Papers Or Trash Thrown On The Ground, On Private Property Beside Mr. Sills' Car

⑧